Bitcoin Move Now
  • Editor’s pick
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
  • Editor’s pick
  • Business
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Bitcoin Move Now
No Result
View All Result
Home Editor's pick

SBF Demands New Trial, Claims Biden’s DOJ Silenced Key FTX Witnesses

February 11, 2026
in Editor's pick
SBF Demands New Trial, Claims Biden’s DOJ Silenced Key FTX Witnesses

The post SBF Demands New Trial, Claims Biden’s DOJ Silenced Key FTX Witnesses appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News

Sam Bankman-Fried has filed a motion for a new trial, claiming that Biden’s Department of Justice threatened witnesses into staying silent or changing what they told the court. He announced the filing on X today.

“New evidence shows that Biden’s DOJ threatened multiple witnesses into silence or into changing their testimony. My conviction should be thrown out,” SBF wrote.

The motion was filed under Rule 33 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on February 10. It includes a sworn declaration from Daniel Chapsky, a former FTX insider who never testified at trial.

What the ‘Silenced’ Witnesses Would Have Said

SBF’s filing names three people he says the DOJ kept from helping his defense: Daniel Chapsky, Ryan Salame, and Nishad Singh.

According to the filing, Chapsky would have told the court that FTX was solvent during its November 2022 liquidity crisis and that customers could be repaid. He also claims Alameda Research’s account on FTX held a net positive balance in the billions throughout 2022.

The filing goes further. It alleges FTX’s bankruptcy estate deliberately manipulated financial data to back the prosecution’s case. It also claims the government “fundamentally misrepresented” what the negative balances in the fiat@ftx.com ledger actually meant.

For Salame and Singh, SBF says the DOJ used threats to block favorable testimony. Singh’s early statements to prosecutors allegedly shifted after pressure, while Salame never took the stand at all.

SBF Wants Judge Kaplan Off the Case

SBF is also calling for Judge Lewis Kaplan to recuse himself from ruling on the motion. He pointed to what he called a “pattern of prejudging defendants,” naming himself, Salame, and President Donald Trump as examples.

Community Remains Divided

Reactions on X were split.

Many dismissed the motion, pointing to the billions lost by FTX users and calling the filing a desperate move. Others saw it differently, with one user calling the Chapsky evidence “eye-opening” and framing the case as a broader failure of judicial fairness.

SBF’s Legal Push Follows Days of Public Claims

This filing comes after a week of posts where SBF accused lawyers of forcing the FTX bankruptcy and claimed prosecutors hid evidence that could have helped his case.

SBF is serving a 25-year sentence after being convicted on seven federal fraud charges tied to FTX’s $8 billion collapse.

Previous Post

Tartisan Nickel Corp. Acquires Additional Nickel-Copper Claims at Turtle Pond, Northwestern Ontario

Next Post

Ethereum Price News as Big Holders Reduce ETH Supply Control

    Join our mailing list to get access to special deals, promotions, and insider information. Your exclusive benefits await! Enjoy personalized recommendations, first dibs on sales, and members-only content that makes you feel like a true VIP. Sign up now and start saving!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    Disclaimer: bitcoinmovenow.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively “The Company”) do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    Recent News

    InoQuant Review: Top Crypto Gainers and Losers and What the Market Is Showing

    InoQuant Review: Top Crypto Gainers and Losers and What the Market Is Showing

    February 11, 2026
    Crypto Retail Traders Are Gambling, Institutions Are Building: Bullish CEO

    Crypto Retail Traders Are Gambling, Institutions Are Building: Bullish CEO

    February 11, 2026
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Email Whitelisting

    Copyright © 2025 bitcoinmovenow.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Email Whitelisting
    • Home 1
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Thank you

    Copyright © 2025 bitcoinmovenow.com | All Rights Reserved